Home
Contact Login

copyright  |  disclaimer  |  privacy policy  |  print ready

« back

Arrow Events
News
›  Current News
›  Articles and Publications
›  News Archive
Arrow About Us
Our Services
Our Partners
Arrow Testimonials
Arrow Useful Links
Arrow Graduate Recruitment

Recent discrimination cases - exceptions and defences

Excerpts from this article first published in ‘Human Resources’ Magazine, Issue 61, 28 July 2004

A recent decision of the Queensland Administrative Decisions Tribunal has clarified an exception in the Anti-Discrimination Act (Qld) which permits discrimination on the basis of reasonable superannuation fund conditions.

A former Queensland police officer was diagnosed with various psychiatric and depressive disorders. The man made a claim under his superannuation fund, Q Super, for total and permanent disablement and provided a psychiatrist's report outlining his condition. The report suggested that if the benefit was paid directly to the man he would require 'assistance and supervision to protect him from bad choices of his own and predatory members of the general community'. Q Super agreed to pay the benefit on the basis that arrangements were made to manage the man's money.

The man claimed that Q Super had directly discriminated against him, that is, Q Super had treated the man less favourably than a person who didn't suffer the psychiatric impairments the man had. Q Super conceded that it had directly discriminated against the man, but that its actions were exempted pursuant to a provision of the Act which permitted discrimination against persons on the basis of ‘reasonable superannuation fund conditions’. Further, the Q Super Trust Deed permitted Q Super to pay benefits to certain persons at its discretion.

The Tribunal found that the actions of Q Super were not 'reasonable' in the circumstances - particularly due to the fact that the Trust Deed did not define the kinds of mental or physical ill health or incapacity which permitted Q Super to pay the benefits to other persons. The Trust Deed also was very broad in its terms such that it gave no certainty as to the types of circumstances where the discretion would be applied by the Trustee or the amount of benefits it may affect.

The Tribunal awarded the man $81,000 in compensation.

HR Tip

Despite the powers and discretion contained in Trust Deeds, Trustees should be careful in exercising their discretion in such matters to ensure that their exercise of their discretion is 'reasonable' and does not conflict with obligations under relevant discrimination laws.

Joanne Ede

Senior Associate

Australian Business Lawyers